Submission-specific structure
Start from the intended submission and expand the work into relevant modules, functions, deliverables, reviews, and decision points.
Translate the submission strategy into structured workstreams, dependencies, milestones, owners, assumptions, and decision gates that the whole program can use.
What it does
Start from the intended submission and expand the work into relevant modules, functions, deliverables, reviews, and decision points.
Show which activities can run in parallel, which require predecessor evidence, and which decisions control the critical path.
Anchor the plan to target dates while preserving the assumptions and constraints that make those dates credible.
Assign functional owners and clarify cross-functional handoffs before late-stage ambiguity becomes schedule risk.
Relate execution activities to the expected regulatory content and document-readiness structure without reducing the plan to a file list.
Reuse the same plan across working views and exported deliverables so dates, owners, and dependencies do not drift between tools.
Connected workflow
Select the authority, submission type, target date, program stage, and known constraints.
Use Sailor and the planning model to build relevant workstreams, tasks, milestones, and assumptions.
Confirm ownership, evidence readiness, dependencies, review cycles, and decision gates.
Use the plan in calendars, reporting, meetings, gap closure, and presentation outputs.
Designed for decisions
Gulfstream connects source material, regulatory reasoning, planning, and deliverables so teams do not have to reconstruct the same work in disconnected systems.
It is software used to translate a regulatory submission objective into coordinated workstreams, deliverables, reviews, dependencies, milestones, owners, assumptions, and decision gates. It should connect the submission structure to the actual program work rather than functioning as a generic task list.
The planner is designed for life-science submissions and can support structures for INDs, NDAs, BLAs, MAAs, and other authority-specific objectives. Users configure the plan for the product, pathway, region, development stage, and applicable requirements.
No. Gulfstream Submission Planner organizes and coordinates the work that leads to a submission. Publishing and gateway transmission remain separate regulated operational activities using appropriately qualified systems and procedures.
Yes. Sailor can help generate a structured starting flow from the stated submission objective and program context. Qualified functional owners should validate tasks, durations, dependencies, evidence assumptions, and authority-specific requirements before the plan is adopted.
Confirmed readiness gaps can be converted into remediation tasks and dependencies so gap closure becomes part of the submission plan rather than a separate static report.
Yes. The connected workflow allows the same milestones, decisions, risks, and assumptions to be used in meeting preparation, reporting, and Slide Studio without rebuilding the underlying story from scratch.
Continue exploring
Use the practical planning framework behind a defensible submission flow.
Learn moreIdentify the missing evidence and decisions the plan must resolve.
Learn moreTranslate the working plan into a decision-ready executive presentation.
Learn moreMove regulatory work forward